| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Why Unified Access to Information is Required

Page history last edited by Dmitry Sokolov 5 years, 1 month ago

Go:

 Visual Taxonomy Links   Hide/Show:

Taxonomy Path

As We May Think

Professionally our methods of transmitting and reviewing the results of research are generations old and by now are totally inadequate for their purpose. If the aggregate time spent in writing scholarly works and in reading them could be evaluated, the ratio between these amounts of time might well be startling. Those who conscientiously attempt to keep abreast of current thought, even in restricted fields, by close and continuous reading might well shy away from an examination calculated to show how much of the previous month's efforts could be produced on call. Mendel's concept of the laws of genetics was lost to the world for a generation because his publication did not reach the few who were capable of grasping and extending it; and this sort of catastrophe is undoubtedly being repeated all about us, as truly significant attainments become lost in the mass of the inconsequential.


Unified Access to Information is Required

to bring all participants literally "on the same page", allow them literally see what each of them doing and eliminate the cause of reoccurring work.

Example:

TiddlyWiki documentation is being written in a number of sites like following:

Only accepting Unified Conceptual Space as a working standard would allow merge all relevant resources and pages within a single workspace like this:

http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/w/page/113973259/TiddlyWiki%20Plugins

Not necessarily on PBWorks / LikeInMind. TiddlyWiki can be as efficient. LikeInMind is thought to be transferred to TW as soon as reliable multi-user operation and secure versioning demonstrated.


http://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&gid=164166&type=member&item=5819397218058145796 

The problem is probably in that scientific activities have no sense for the rest of the population. The problem is in the "disruption" of the "conceptual space". Researchers use different words to describe their realities, and their realities are very different from the realities of the conventional people. Researchers, for example, even have to create the new concepts to describe new models and processes. And vice versa, they create new realities, methods and ways of thinking, frequently too difficult to understand by non-professionals. However, those "difficult" concepts are nothing more than just "tools" shaped for the specific activities and needs.

Generation and maintenance of the links between "scientific" and "conventional" conceptual spaces is difficult but not impossible task. That can be realised by means of "virtual associative networks" assuming that our thoughts and concepts are built of associations. The concepts are easily accessible and interpreted if published within "Unified Conceptual Space".

I might have used a number of new and unusual concepts in this post. The reality however is very simple. Both researchers and "normal people" have to start working towards mutual understanding of what is going on in Science, and that cannot be done by "someone" and "at once". There is quite a bit of theory behind those words.

Please refer to the noaSphere (Internet of Sense) for definitions, concepts and best practices on the subject:

http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/w/page/62073491/Why%20Unified%20Access%20to%20Information%20is%20Required

IVAN: http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/w/page/67722926/Integrated%20Virtual%20Associative%20Network

Internet of Sense: http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/w/page/72007334/Does%20Internet%20of%20Sense%20Has%20Sense


Gary Flake, CEO of Clipboard

15:26 so most recently I've taken all of my

15:29 travel stuff and instead of having to

15:31 explicitly share each bit of travel

15:34 planning with my wife she's now a member

15:37 or a writer of the board and so as I

15:40 start piecing together my own business

15:41 traveling it goes there she's kind of in

15:43 control of the family traveling that

15:45 goes there as well so we have one place

15:47 where all the flight reservations the

15:49 hotel reservations the maps the rental

15:51 car confirmations all this other stuff

15:53 is just in one spot and that's really

15:56 nice that's really nice to have we're

15:58 also converting a lot of the tracking

16:02 that we do with press and marketing and

16:05 other things and in to clipboard a

16:07 little bit more intentionally for a long

16:09 time we've been clipping things in

16:11 tacking the in tagging and clipboard

16:13 press whenever there's an article about

16:14 this but now what we do is internally we

16:17 have a couple of shared boards just

16:19 around kind of you know market analysis

16:21 and and and impress and other things and

16:24 so just creating this collaboration

16:26 spaces has been a lot of fun


Unified Conceptual Space (UCS) is the ultimate means of the protection of the Intellectual Property:

Local vs Global Priority of Intellectual Property


Social Networks become more and more specialised: 10 Social Networks For Special Interests.

Finding specific multidisciplinary information becomes tricky without search engines, see comments below. We are facing production of huge amount of fragmented but nut structured information. Repetitive work of creation and/or entering same or similar information can be reduced only in Unified Information Space.


We’ve written a number of times about how Google is lacking real time search, and potentially sending information seekers to Twitter. A recent NYT report talked about more people starting their product searches at Amazon rather than Google. We asked Fox what kinds of information she is turning to non Google sites and services for.

“I primarily use Urban Spoon for restaurant searches,” she says. “And Oyster or Tablet Hotels for hotel searches. Although I then will search Google for hotel reviews but will specifically click on Tripadvisor results, rather than search Tripadvisor directly. No, I can’t explain this behavior.”

http://www.webpronews.com/former-googler-vanessa-fox-talks-about-googles-changes-and-controversies-2012-12

https://www.facebook.com/groups/LikeInMind/permalink/1603057140015292/?comment_id=1603682399952766&reply_comment_id=1604247783229561&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R2%22%7D

Dmitry Sokolov

Dmitry Sokolov I would talk theoretically below, as we can't say "impossible" if we tried and failed. Maybe, someone will succeed, and we did not even try... :)

`To make it working, the Internet of Database should be organised on the principles similar to the principles of Internet, and namely single and unified address space for all interconnected computers, all websites and all web pages.

To my memory, the address space is stored and replicated in DNS servers. All DNS servers must have identical copies of the address tables.

Similarly to DNS, a topic titles server should be created and maintained (topics synchronisation) to keep the Internet of Databases going without collisions. We discussed that with M Ichael a few weeks ago (semantic overlay network). This kind of server is thought of being realised in the future P2PCI platform: AIMS

Synchronisation was thought to be realised in the hybrid mode, both client-server and client-client, for enhanced reliability of the system.

This point of view is supported by works of Jack Park: Knowledge Garden

and Joel Parthemore: Unified Conceptual Space Theory


Dmitry Sokolov

Dmitry Sokolov M Ichael, "I see linking in as the associative network being created." I see it as the associative network too.

The "natural" associative networks as I understand them are created within limits of a single individual's mind. Each of us has his own associative network. If we imagine a part of associative network moved between two minds, it becomes disrupted. When disrupted, it becomes disconnected, invisible and inaccessible that is equal to nonexistence.

Same for virtual associative networks. Those created away from the Unified Conceptual Space do not exist for the users of that particular Conceptual Space. It may come to life when mentioned by users of other Conceptual Space but only in the volume and context of their interaction.

`As an example, most of my communication is taking place on FB. If I need to recall something from the "external memory" I go to LiM, not because I think that the information I need can be found only there but because I am not sure whether your or Rama's Conceptual Space have it published. That's how our virtual associative networks get separated / scattered between platforms.

`Temporary and very limited in content synchronisation of those networks may take place during live conversations, following "resonating" ideas and intents. Full or complete synchronisation of virtual associative networks can be done only within a Unified Conceptual Space that is currently possible only within a single PBWorks site. To have our current PVANs fully synchronised and navigated, a new P2PCI platform / "content aggregator" is to be developed.

Like · Reply · Just now


Links  

Subcategories

Pages

What's Missing With Big Data - Human Filters

Pages in Other Languages

Categories

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.