-
If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.
-
You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!
|
Towards a Fourth Generation Pattern Language
Page history
last edited
by Dmitry Sokolov 7 years, 8 months ago
http://www.slideshare.net/helenefinidori/plast-presentationpurplsoc-v3
Towards a Fourth Generation Pattern Language
-
1. Pattern Languages for Systemic Transformation
- Towards a 4th Generation of Pattern Languages
- PURPLSOC 2015
- Helene Finidori – Sayfan Borghini
-
2. Bridging multiple paths
- “On each continent and in each nation one can find creative bubbling, a multitude of political initiatives in the direction of economic, social, political, cognitive, educational, ethical or existential regeneration.
- But everything that must be connected is yet dispersed, compartmented, separated {Resources Fragmentation - DVS}. These initiatives are not aware of each other, no institution enumerates them, and no one is familiar with them. They are nonetheless the livestock for the future. It is now a matter of recognizing, aggregating, enlisting them in order to open up transformational paths. {Methods of aggregating and enlisting, in Unified Conceptual Space? - DVS}
- These multiple paths, jointly developing, will intermesh to form a new Path which will decompose into the paths each of us will follow and which will guide us toward the still invisible and inconceivable metamorphosis.” - Morin, E. (2011). La Voie: Pour l'avenir de l'Humanité. (Paris: Fayard). Pp. 34. Translated by H. Finidori. {Resources Unification Fundamentals? - DVS}
-
3. The Challenges of Societal Change
- From a big picture, aggregated perspective?
- Are we actually changing something? And is the change we ‘design’ going in the ‘right’ direction?
- What is my ‘place’ my ‘position’ in the space of societal change? And how can my own endeavor benefit the whole?
- How can what others are doing benefit my own endeavor? And how can my own endeavor benefit others? {"Knowledge Sharing" problem? - DVS}
-
4. Pattern Languages & Societal Change
- The Pursuit of Pattern Languages for Societal Change involves
- 1. The development of domain specific or project specific {Definitions of domains and projects in this context? - DVS} Pattern Languages towards societal change {Societal vs Cultural Change? - DVS}.
- 2. Looking at how pattern languages can help coalesce various societal change efforts to increase collective awareness and multiply the impact of disparate initiatives.
-
5. Mulifaceted Engagement in Social Change
-
What we chose to focus our attention, efforts and resources on
-
Why we do what we do, what drives us
-
How we function, process information, interact with systems and people
-
Learning styles
-
Mental functions
-
Creative styles
-
Values
-
Beliefs
-
Motivations
- Technologies
-
Language; Paradigm;
-
Telos: the intentionality through which the why becomes a what
-
Know-How: the praxis through which the How becomes a What
-
Paradigm: the thought patterns through which the Why becomes a How
Language
Social Change Agent
|
What
|
Why
|
How
|
What
|
we chose to focus our attention, efforts and resources on
Systems observed & transformed Objects of attention |
Telos: the intentionality through which the why becomes a what |
Know-How: the praxis through which the How becomes a What |
Why
|
Telos: the intentionality through which the why becomes a what |
we do what we do, what drives us
Where To Intentions Psycho-cognitive Drivers |
Paradigm: the thought patterns through which the Why becomes a How
|
How
|
Know-How: the praxis through which the How becomes a What
|
Paradigm: the thought patterns through which the Why becomes a How
|
we function, process information, Interact with systems and people
Relationships to each-other & the system Practices |
- 6. Shaping the paradigms our systems arise from. Donella Meadows – 12 Points to intervene in a System
-
7. Dimensions, prioritized
- This applies to social change too: Independently from their actual paradigm, telos and know-how, change agents individually or in groups may prefer to intervene on the ‘thing’ itself, on the practices or on the intentions and motivations of stakeholders (Commons, commoning, commoners)… etc…
-
8. Agency, multifaceted and distributed
- Individuals or groups assemble in clusters around one or several shared dimensions of change, engagement or action, with variable degrees of cohesiveness on all preferences. {Mechanisms of Formation of Self-Organising Teams }
- Change is driven from a whole variety of clusters that cannot or do not necessarily want to align on any if not all of these dimensions.
- Note that a How or a Why for one group can be a What (object of attention and care) for another, and that the development of a how or a what can be invoked as a why… {IVAN consists only of the topics/knowledge nodes and links/associations between the topics - DVS}
- Which makes things rather complicated when talking about strategies for change. {It would be nice to show that on examples. - DVS}
-
9. Agency, clusters and interconnected
- These bubbles of agency, or islands of language and knowledge are effective in their own cohesive domain of focus.
- They function effectively and convergently within their own boundaries, with new ideas that permeate through areas of overlap with other clusters. {Ideas on same topic are collected in IVAN in same node of the HashAt Space, found instantly and "ready" for reuse - DVS}
- For change to cross boundaries and be sustainable it needs to occur in a variety of ways and come from a variety of places in the system. A network of interventions on whys, hows and whats that can cross pollinate each other. {Can we elaborate on "iii" together please? - DVS}
- “Social networks influence how ideas and beliefs can spread around a society. In this study, the University of Pennsylvania's Damon Centola shows that networks that are very diffuse (left) make it hard for ideas to catch on, while networks with very strong group boundaries (right) make it almost impossible for ideas to spread. A network that was moderately "grouped," however, was most conducive to spreading complex ideas.” Credit: University of Pennsylvania
- Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-06-social-networks-group-boundaries-ideas.html and Why Being The Most Connected Is A Vanity Metric as a method of transfer from "right" to moderately "grouped". {The question here, how do we measure/control shapes of networks? Would IVAN concept and practice be sufficient for the successful exchange of ideas? - DVS}
- Are we actually changing something? And is the change going in the ‘right’ direction?
- We must find ways to make sure our designs and their evolution responds to the intended directionality of the system in a sustainable way (telos)
- What is my ‘place’ my ‘position’ in the space of societal change? And how can my own endeavor benefit the whole?
- We must find ways to understand and recognize each other across domains and paradigms, and accommodate our divergent priorities and intentionalities. {Goals, Objectives, Methods? Would @ and # planes of HashAt Space be a solution? - DVS}
- How can what others are doing benefit my own endeavor? And how can my own endeavor benefit others?
- How to increase collective awareness and make ‘agency’ more effective at the collective level?
How to increase collective awareness and make ‘agency’ more effective at the collective level?
Collective Awareness & Agency
|
What
|
Why
|
How
|
What
|
Systems observed & transformed Nexus of attention |
Telos: Make sure our designs and their evolution responds to the intended directionality of the system in a sustainable way
|
Know-How: Exchange and cross-pollinate experience and know-how across domains |
Why
|
Telos: Make sure our designs and their evolution responds to the intended directionality of the system in a sustainable way |
System Intentionality
Psycho-cognitive Drivers
|
Paradigm: Understand and recognize each-other across paradigms and leverage the contribution of each to the whole Accommodate divergent intentionalities… |
How
|
Know-How: Exchange and cross-pollinate experience and know-how across domains |
Paradigm: Understand and recognize each-other across paradigms and leverage the contribution of each to the whole Accommodate divergent intentionalities… |
Relationships to each-other & the system Practices |
They addresses the three dimensions of change in each of their specific domains
Pattern & Pattern Languages
|
What
|
Why
|
How
|
What
|
Systems observed & transformed Objects of attention |
Telos: Vehicle for a Purpose: QWAN, Wholeness, Aliveness, life supporting etc…
Give a directionality to the designed objects
|
Know-How: Organized procedure and tool, instrument for sense-making and design to purpose |
Why
|
Telos: Vehicle for a Purpose: QWAN, Wholeness, Aliveness, life supporting etc…
Give a directionality to the designed objects
|
System Intentionality
Psycho-cognitive Drivers
|
Paradigm: Lingua Franca in a domain of practice, formalizing tacit knowledge |
How
|
Know-How: Organized procedure and tool, instrument for sense-making and design to purpose |
Paradigm: Lingua Franca in a domain of practice, formalizing tacit knowledge |
Relationships to each-other & the system Practices |
Christopher Alexander was on a quest to integrate complexity into Design.
In the words of Alexander: “The creation of fine-tuned, well-adapted Complexity must now take shape as a major topic of scientific thought. Our ability or failure to master this science is crucial to our survival”
However, design patterns as problem solution constructs became a way to reduce complexity while we need more than ever patterns to support our understanding of complexity and that can help us expand opportunities and alternatives.
The recent decades achieved a greater maturity in the understanding of organized complexity allowing us to better see the rich set of dynamics and effects produced by systems. We need to bring these insights into pattern languages. {Can we discuss slides 13- as applied to solving a particular problem please? - DVS}
Alexander asked “what is the criteria of success for a complex system?”
We design systems, over time they take their own dynamics, and we have little means to monitor the evolution of systems in relation to their intended directionality.
We do need to introduce and build a transversal knowledge for the navigation and orientation of systems along their evolution in time.
Patterns are a critical tool in this, in the possibility they embody to connect general abstract theory to the local practice across contexts and cultures. {Conventional scientific method and practice suggests existence of multiple and "contradicting" hypothesis and theories applicable to each particular problem: Incompleteness Theorem. Compared to the conventional scientific practice, STA postulates co-emergence of concepts and experience as well as theories and languages and the systems as such that are created/adjusted to suit processes of consideration and solving of each particular problem at each given period of time (considering Scientific Knowledge Half-Life Time Is 50 Years and is expected to be significantly dropped along with our journey to "Singularity"). In other way, patterns created for consideration of a problem in one cultural environment can be observed at different cultural environment, or not. What seems being a pattern can well be a critically different thing, see patterns in living creatures mimicking appearance and even behavior of other organisms, elements of flora and other elements of nature. - DVS}
Patterns can be connected through systemic elements, which also establish a semantic connection across pattern languages and domains of practice.
{In other words, criterion of success for a complex system is following it's intended directionality? - DVS}
There is a correlation between structural aspects of a system, the behavior of it, and the possible ways in which it evolves its initial behavior over time, that pattern languages can encode and decode in order to orient and evolve our designs.
Function Of the System
|
Structure
|
Evolution
|
Behavior
|
Structure
|
Forms and systems people build or that arise from social interaction |
Becoming |
Constrains
|
Evolution
|
Becoming
|
The way the system transforms, adapting over time (generating, depleting, changing) |
Potentiality |
Behavior
|
Constrains |
Potentiality |
The way the system operates over time |
|
Object of Design
|
Act of Design
|
Purpose
|
Orientation
|
Pattern Language 4.0
|
Dynamic Systemic Forms (Structures & Systemic behaviors, Relationships & Effects)
|
Design is emergent in the system, stigmergetic and self-organizing over time
|
Connecting agencies across domains and praxis
|
Collective interpretation and navigation of system directionality
|
Pattern Language 3.0
|
Forms of Human Action (Innovation, Education, Learning, Presentation, Collaboration)
|
Design Act is Embeded in Actions over Time
|
Connecting People who have Different Experiences
|
Collaborative discovery, sense-making and learning in action
|
Pattern Language 2.0
|
Non-Physical Forms (Software, Interface, Organization)
|
Design Act is Iterated over Time
|
Bridging the Gap between Expert and Non-Expert Designers
|
Efficiency and accuracy of development
|
Pattern Language 1.0
|
Physical Forms (Architecture)
|
Design Act is Basically Carried out in a Period
|
Bridging the Gap between Designers and Users
|
Practice of design
|
Adapted from Takashi Iba – Comparison among generations of Pattern Language
How can this be put to work so that these various pattern languages interconnect, ‘serve’ and complement each other?
|
What
|
Why
|
How
|
What
|
Systems observed & transformed Objects of attention |
Orientation
|
Know-How
|
Why
|
Orientation
|
System Intentionality
Psycho-cognitive Drivers
|
Paradigm |
How
|
Know-How
|
Paradigm
|
Relationships to each-other & the system Practices |
Collective Interpretation,
Mediation,
Orientation
|
What
|
Why
|
How
|
What
|
Systems observed & transformed Objects of attention |
Telos:
Systemic Pattern Language
Decode - Encode
Access - Evolve
|
Know-How:
Know-How Repository
Learn - Share
Explore - Probe
|
Why
|
Telos:
Systemic Pattern Language
Decode - Encode
Access - Evolve
|
System Intentionality
Psycho-cognitive Drivers
|
Paradigm:
Hermeneutic Inquiry
Distinguish - Understand
Appreciate - Federate
|
How
|
Know-How:
Know-How Repository
Learn - Share
Explore - Probe
|
Paradigm:
Hermeneutic Inquiry
Distinguish - Understand
Appreciate - Federate
|
Relationships to each-other & the system Practices |
‘Hacking’ & Sense-making
Systemic Interpretation Elements as units of structure and behavior enable the recognition, sense making and ‘re-elaboration’ of observed or known systemic phenomena, identified issues, alternative possibilities and models.
|
Systemic Inquiry
These elements are combined into systemic patterns as building blocks to describe and interpret (encode, decode) interacting forces and dynamics in domain patterns, operating on a meta-level to assess, compare and evolve models and practices.
|
Assessing Fitness to Purpose
The Pattern as tool to cast “intention” or desired effect can help monitor course of action and readjust structures, models and practice.
|
Semantic Inquiry
Semantic Connections are established through primitives and systemic patterns used as tags to connect patterns across pattern languages and domains, and across levels.
|
Collective Hermeneutic Approach
The Pattern as unit of research through a hermeneutic process and the recording of controversies and evolution of thought, enables to better address wicked and almost impossible challenges involving multiple domains and patterns.
|
Searchable and navigable repository
The Pattern as knowledge format enables the recording and sharing of know-how in an interoperable format.
|
Collaborative Learning & Design
The Pattern as ‘object’ of collaborative discussions is used as learning tool on the field for deeper understanding and collective problem solving.
|
Orientation heuristics
An orientation engine based on angles of approach, action logics, cognitive preferences, helps navigate adjacent possibles and create multiple personas and scenarios.
|
Mutual Discovery
Semantic connections enable collective exploration of possibilities across pattern languages, domain and levels in the system.
|
|
Know-How Repository
Towards a Fourth Generation Pattern Language
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.