| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Management

Page history last edited by Dmitry PNGHS 2 months, 1 week ago
Go:  Visual Taxonomy Links   Hide/Show:

Taxonomy Path

Top > Business > Management

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Management

Index of management articles Management Outline of business management SupervisionA A3 problem solving Abusive supervision Action item Adhocracy Advisory board Agile contracts Airport and airline management Allegiance (company) Annex SL Asset management Association management Association management company Authoritarian leadership style Automated decision supportB Backsourcing Balanced scorecard Base Stock Model Bed management Behavioral risk management Best current practice Best practice Board of directors Board of governors Bottleneck (production) Build to order Build to stock Business agility Business builder Business economics Business guru Business model Business plan Business process improvement Business process interoperability Business process mapping Business relationship management Business rule Business rule mining Business value Business workflow analysis Business-oriented architectureC Capability management Capability management in business Category management (purchasing) Central administration Certified in Production and Inventory Management Certified management consultant Certified Project Management Professional Change advisory board Chaordic organization CIFMS City management Cog's ladder Cognitive inertia Commercial management Communications management Communities of innovation Community management Community of practice Community-based management Competence-based management Competitive advantage Competitive heterogeneity Complementary assets Completed staff work Concept of operations Concept of the Corporation Friedrich Glasl's Model of Conflict Escalation Consensus decision-making Context analysis Continuous monitoring Continuous-flow manufacturing Contractor management Control (management) Control limits Core competency Corporate and Project Management Research Institute Corporate governance Draft:Service governance Corporate recovery Corporate transparency Corrective and preventive action Corticon Court of assistants Coworking CPS model Crisis management Crisis plan Critical chain project management Critical management studies Critical path method Cross ownership Customer benefit package Cynefin FrameworkD Data item descriptions Decentralized decision-making Decision management Defensive expenditures Delegation Demand chain management Design leadership Design management Devaux’s Index of Project Performance (the DIPP) Diffusion (business) Digital strategy Director (business) Discovery-driven planning Disintermediation Distributed management DMSMS Document automation Dominant design Double linking Downstream (manufacturing) Duality (CoPs) Dynamic enterprise modeling Dynamic lot-size modelE Earned schedule Earned value management Economic lot scheduling problem Economic order quantity Economic production quantity Empowerment Energy management software Energy monitoring and targeting Engineer to order Engineering management Enterprise optimization Enterprise planning system Enterprise resource planning Entertainment management Entrepreneurial orientation Environmental stewardship Event chain diagram Event chain methodology Event management Event to knowledge Evidence-based management Executive compensation Executive development Experience curve effects Extended enterpriseF Facilitation Facilitator Failure demand Fall guy Feedforward (management) Field force automation Field service management Final assembly schedule Financial planning (business) Flat organization Fleet management Focused improvement Force-field analysis Formula for change Four phase model Fraud deterrence Functional managementG Gemba Gen inertia Goal Goals breakdown structure Gradients of agreement scaleH Heijunka box Hierarchical organizationI I-VMS Identity formation In-depth-systemics Industrial democracy Industrial forensics Industrial market segmentation Industry or market research Information excellence Information technology security audit Infrastructure asset management Innovation leadership Innovation management Inside job Instruction creep Integrated management Integrated master plan Integrative thinking Intellectual capital management Intelligent customer Interim management Internal customer Intopia Investment control IT performance management Iterative and incremental developmentJ Japanese management culture Jarratt report Job rotation Joy's law (management) Just in case

For other uses, see Management (disambiguation). "Manager" redirects here. For other uses, see Manager (disambiguation).

Part of a series on
Strategy
Strategy topics

Major dimensions

Major thinkers

Concepts

Frameworks and tools

Business administration
Management of a business

Accounting

Business entities

Corporate governance

Corporate law

Corporate title

Economics

Finance

Types of management

Organization

Trade

Part of the Politics series
Politics

Management (or managing) is the administration of organizations, whether they are a business, a nonprofit organization, or a government body through business administration, nonprofit management, or the political science sub-field of public administration respectively. It is the science of managing the resources of businesses, governments, and other organizations.

Management includes the activities of setting the strategy of an organization and coordinating the efforts of its employees or volunteers to accomplish its objectives through the application of available resources, such as financial, natural, technological, allocated authority, and human resources. "Run the business"[1] and "Change the business" are two concepts that are used in management to differentiate between the continued delivery of goods or services and adapting of goods or services to meet the changing needs of customers - see trend. The term "management" may also refer to those people who manage an organization—managers.

Some people study management at colleges and universities; major degree programs in management within the private sector include the Bachelor of Commerce (B.Com.), Bachelor of Science/Bachelor of Business Administration (BSBA/BBA.), Master of Business Administration (MBA.), Master in Management/Master of Science in Management (MiM/MSM) and, for management in the public sector, degree programs include the Bachelor of Arts (BA) or Bachelor of Science (BS) in political science (PoliSci) with a concentration in public administration, and the Master of Public Administration (MPA) degrees. Interdisciplinary degree programs such as the Master of Nonprofit Organizations (MNO) or the Master of Nonprofit Management (MNM) exist, as well as the MPA/MBA dual degree program where coursework for both the Master of Public Administration and Master of Business Administration are taken at the same time to complete the degree program in a shorter time than doing both separately. Individuals who aim to become management specialists or experts, management researchers, or professors may complete the Doctor of Management (DM), the Doctor of Business Administration (DBA), the Doctor of Public Administration (DPA), the PhD in business administration, the PhD in management, or the PhD in political science with a concentration in public administration. In the past few decades, there has been a movement for evidence-based management.[2]

Larger organizations generally have three hierarchical levels of managers,[3] in a pyramid structure:

  • Senior managers such as members of a board of directors and a chief executive officer (CEO) or a president of an organization sets the strategic goals and policy of the organization and make decisions on how the overall organization will operate. Senior managers are generally executive-level professionals who provide direction to middle management, and directly or indirectly report to them.
  • Middle managers such as branch managers, regional managers, department managers, and section managers, who provide direction to the front-line managers. They communicate the strategic goals and policy of senior management to the front-line managers.
  • Line managers such as supervisors and front-line team leaders, oversee the work of regular employees, or volunteers in some voluntary organizations, and provide direction on their work. Line managers often perform the managerial functions that are traditionally considered as the core of management. Despite the name, they are usually considered part of the workforce and not part of the organization's management class.
  • Some professional service employees who have similar duties to and use the same skills as managers without supervisory duties such as regular employees classified as white-collar workers with specialized training in liberal arts and pure sciences education or professional development education as opposed to blue-collar workers working in manual labor or the skilled trades.
  • Some grey-collar workers who are in a career advancement transitional or intermediary stage between blue-collar and white-collar work, where formerly blue-collar workers perform managerial duties supervising others that perform manual labor or skilled trades.

In smaller organizations, a manager may have a much wider scope and may perform several roles or even all of the roles commonly observed in a large organization.

Social scientists study management as an academic discipline, investigating areas such as social organization, organizational adaptation, and organizational leadership.[4]

Etymology

The English verb manage has its roots in the fifteenth-century French verb mesnager, which often referred in equestrian language "to hold in hand the reins of a horse".[5] Also the Italian term maneggiare (to handle, especially tools or a horse) is possible. In Spanish, manejar can also mean to rule the horses.[6] These three terms derive from the two Latin words manus (hand) and agere (to act).

The French word for housekeeping, ménagerie, derived from ménager ("to keep house"; compare ménage for "household"), also encompasses taking care of domestic animals. Ménagerie is the French translation of Xenophon's famous book Oeconomicus[7] (Greek: Οἰκονομικός) on household matters and husbandry. The French word mesnagement (or ménagement) influenced the semantic development of the English word management in the 17th and 18th centuries.[8]

Definitions

Views on the definition and scope of management include:

  • Henri Fayol (1841–1925) stated: "to manage is to forecast and to plan, to organise, to command, to co-ordinate and to control".[9]
  • Fredmund Malik (1944– ) defines management as "the transformation of resources into utility".[10]
  • Management is included[by whom?] as one of the factors of production – along with machines, materials and money.
  • Ghislain Deslandes defines management as "a vulnerable force, under pressure to achieve results and endowed with the triple power of constraint, imitation and imagination, operating on subjective, interpersonal, institutional and environmental levels".[11]
  • Peter Drucker (1909–2005) saw the basic task of management as twofold: marketing and innovation. Nevertheless, innovation is also linked to marketing (product innovation is a central strategic marketing issue).[citation needed] Drucker identifies marketing as a key essence for business success, but management and marketing are generally understood[by whom?] as two different branches of business administration knowledge.

Theoretical scope

Management involves identifying the mission, objective, procedures, rules and manipulation[12] of the human capital of an enterprise to contribute to the success of the enterprise.[13] Scholars have focused on the management of individual,[14] organizational,[15] and inter-organizational relationships. This implies effective communication: an enterprise environment (as opposed to a physical or mechanical mechanism) implies human motivation and implies some sort of successful progress or system outcome.[16] As such, management is not the manipulation of a mechanism (machine or automated program), not the herding of animals, and can occur either in a legal or in an illegal enterprise or environment. From an individual's perspective, management does not need to be seen solely from an enterprise point of view, because management is an essential[quantify] function in improving one's life and relationships.[17] Management is therefore everywhere[18] and it has a wider range of application.[clarification needed] Communication and a positive endeavor are two main aspects of it either through enterprise or through independent pursuit.[citation needed] Plans, measurements, motivational psychological tools, goals, and economic measures (profit, etc.) may or may not be necessary components for there to be management. At first, one views management functionally, such as measuring quantity, adjusting plans, and meeting goals,[citation needed] but this applies even in situations where planning does not take place. From this perspective, Henri Fayol (1841–1925)[19][page needed] considers management to consist of five functions:

  • planning (forecasting)
  • organizing
  • commanding
  • coordinating
  • controlling

In another way of thinking, Mary Parker Follett (1868–1933), allegedly defined management as "the art of getting things done through people".[20] She described management as a philosophy.[21][need quotation to verify]

Critics,[which?] however, find this definition useful but far too narrow. The phrase "management is what managers do" occurs widely,[22] suggesting the difficulty of defining management without circularity, the shifting nature of definitions[citation needed] and the connection of managerial practices with the existence of a managerial cadre or of a class.

One habit of thought regards management as equivalent to "business administration" and thus excludes management in places outside commerce, as for example in charities and in the public sector. More broadly, every organization must "manage" its work, people, processes, technology, etc. to maximize effectiveness.[citation needed] Nonetheless, many people refer to university departments that teach management as "business schools". Some such institutions (such as the Harvard Business School) use that name, while others (such as the Yale School of Management) employ the broader term "management".

English-speakers may also use the term "management" or "the management" as a collective word describing the managers of an organization, for example of a corporation.[23] Historically this use of the term often contrasted with the term labor – referring to those being managed.[24]

But in the present era[when?] the concept of management is identified[by whom?] in the wide areas[which?] and its frontiers have been pushed[by whom?] to a broader range.[citation needed] Apart from profitable organizations, even non-profit organizations apply management concepts. The concept and its uses are not constrained[by whom?]. Management as a whole is the process of planning, organizing, directing, leading and controlling.[25]

Levels

An organization chart for the United States Coast Guard shows the hierarchy of managerial roles in that organization

A common management structure of organizations includes three management levels: first-level, middle-level, and top-level managers. First-line managers are the lowest level of management and manage the work of non-managerial individuals who are directly involved with the production or creation of the organization's products. First-line managers are often called supervisors, but may also be called line managers, office managers, or even foremen. Middle managers include all levels of management between the first-line level and the top level of the organization. These managers manage the work of first-line managers and may have titles such as department head, project leader, plant manager, or division manager. Top managers are responsible for making organization-wide decisions and establishing the plans and goals that affect the entire organization. These individuals typically have titles such as executive vice president, president, managing director, chief operating officer, chief executive officer, or chairman of the board.

These managers are classified in a hierarchy of authority, and perform different tasks. In many organizations, the number of managers in every level resembles a pyramid. Each level is explained below in specifications of their different responsibilities and likely job titles.[26]

Top management

The top or senior layer of management is a small group which consists of the board of directors (including non-executive directors, executive directors and independent directors), president, vice-president, CEOs and other members of the C-level executives. Different organizations have various members in their C-suite, which may include a chief financial officer, chief technology officer, and so on. They are responsible for controlling and overseeing the operations of the entire organization. They set a "tone at the top" and develop strategic plans, company policies, and make decisions on the overall direction of the organization. In addition, top-level managers play a significant role in the mobilization of outside resources. Senior managers are accountable to the shareholders, the general public and to public bodies that oversee corporations and similar organizations. Some members of the senior management may serve as the public face of the organization, and they may make speeches to introduce new strategies or appear in marketing.

The board of directors is typically primarily composed of non-executives who owe a fiduciary duty to shareholders and are not closely involved in the day-to-day activities of the organization, although this varies depending on the type (e.g., public versus private), size and culture of the organization. These directors are theoretically liable for breaches of that duty and typically insured under directors and officers liability insurance. Fortune 500 directors are estimated to spend 4.4 hours per week on board duties, and median compensation was $212,512 in 2010. The board sets corporate strategy, makes major decisions such as major acquisitions,[27] and hires, evaluates, and fires the top-level manager (chief executive officer or CEO). The CEO typically hires other positions. However, board involvement in the hiring of other positions such as the chief financial officer (CFO) has increased.[28] In 2013, a survey of over 160 CEOs and directors of public and private companies found that the top weaknesses of CEOs were "mentoring skills" and "board engagement", and 10% of companies never evaluated the CEO.[29] The board may also have certain employees (e.g., internal auditors) report to them or directly hire independent contractors; for example, the board (through the audit committee) typically selects the auditor.

Helpful skills of top management vary by the type of organization but typically include[30] a broad understanding of competition, world economies, and politics. In addition, the CEO is responsible for implementing and determining (within the board's framework) the broad policies of the organization. Executive management accomplishes the day-to-day details, including: instructions for preparation of department budgets, procedures, schedules; appointment of middle level executives such as department managers; coordination of departments; media and governmental relations; and shareholder communication.

Middle management

Consist of general managers, branch managers and department managers. They are accountable to the top management for their department's function. They devote more time to organizational and directional functions. Their roles can be emphasized as executing organizational plans in conformance with the company's policies and the objectives of the top management, they define and discuss information and policies from top management to lower management, and most importantly they inspire and provide guidance to lower-level managers towards better performance.

Middle management is the midway management of a categorized organization, being secondary to the senior management but above the deepest levels of operational members. An operational manager may be well-thought-out by middle management or may be categorized as non-management operate, liable to the policy of the specific organization. The efficiency of the middle level is vital in any organization since they bridge the gap between top level and bottom level staffs.

Their functions include:

  • Designing and implementing effective group and inter-group work and information systems
  • Defining and monitoring group-level performance indicators
  • Diagnosing and resolving problems within and among workgroups
  • Designing and implementing reward systems that support cooperative behavior, as well as making decisions and sharing ideas with top managers

Line management

Line managers include supervisors, section leaders, forepersons and team leaders. They focus on controlling and directing regular employees. They are usually responsible for assigning employees' tasks, guiding and supervising employees on day-to-day activities, ensuring the quality and quantity of production and/or service, making recommendations and suggestions to employees on their work, and channeling employee concerns that they cannot resolve to mid-level managers or other administrators. First-level or "front line" managers also act as role models for their employees. In some types of work, front line managers may also do some of the same tasks that employees do, at least some of the time. For example, in some restaurants, the front line managers will also serve customers during a very busy period of the day. In general, line managers are considered part of the workforce and not part of the organization's proper management despite performing traditional management functions.

Front-line managers typically provide:

  • Training for new employees
  • Basic supervision
  • Motivation
  • Performance feedback and guidance

Some front-line managers may also provide career planning for employees who aim to rise within the organization.

Training and education

Further information: Business school, Public policy school, and College of Arts and Sciences

Colleges and universities around the world offers bachelor's degrees, graduate degrees, diplomas and certificates in management; generally within their colleges of business, business schools or faculty of management but also in other related departments. In the 2010s era, there has been an increase in online management education and training in the form of electronic educational technology (also called e-learning). Online education has increased the accessibility of management training to people who do not live near a college or university, or who cannot afford to travel to a city where such training is available.

Requirement

While some professions require academic credentials in order to work in the profession (e.g., law, medicine, engineering, which require, respectively the Bachelor of Law, Doctor of Medicine and Bachelor of Engineering degrees), management and administration positions do not necessarily require the completion of academic degrees. Some well-known senior executives in the US who did not complete a degree include Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg. However, many managers and executives have completed some type of business or management training, such as a Bachelor of Commerce or a Master of Business Administration degree. Some major organizations, including companies, non-profit organizations and governments, require applicants to managerial or executive positions to hold at minimum bachelor's degree in a field related to administration or management, or in the case of business jobs, a Bachelor of Commerce or a similar degree.

Undergraduate

Further information: Business education § Undergraduate education, Political science, and Public administration

At the undergraduate level, the most common business programs are the Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) and Bachelor of Commerce (B.Com.). These typically comprise a four-year program designed to give students an overview of the role of managers in planning and directing within an organization. Course topics include accounting, financial management, statistics, marketing, strategy, and other related areas.

There are many other undergraduate degrees that include the study of management, such as Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Science degrees with a major in business administration or management and the Bachelor of Arts (BA) or Bachelor of Science (BS) in political science (PoliSci) with a concentration in public administration or the Bachelor of Public Administration (B.P.A), a degree designed for individuals aiming to work as bureaucrats in the government jobs. Many colleges and universities also offer certificates and diplomas in business administration or management, which typically require one to two years of full-time study.

To manage technological areas, one often needs an undergraduate degree in a STEM area.

Graduate

Further information: Business education § Postgraduate education

At the graduate level students aiming at careers as managers or executives may choose to specialize in major subareas of management or business administration such as entrepreneurship, human resources, international business, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management,[31] accounting, corporate finance, entertainment, global management, healthcare management, investment management, sustainability and real estate.

A Master of Business Administration (MBA) is the most popular professional degree at the master's level and can be obtained from many universities in the United States. MBA programs provide further education in management and leadership for graduate students. Other master's degrees in business and management include Master of Management (MM) and the Master of Science (M.Sc.) in business administration or management, which is typically taken by students aiming to become researchers or professors.

There are also specialized master's degrees in administration for individuals aiming at careers outside of business, such as the Master of Public Administration (MPA) degree (also offered as a Master of Arts or Master of Science in public administration in some universities), for students aiming to become managers or executives in the public service and the Master of Health Administration, for students aiming to become managers or executives in the health care and hospital sector.

Management doctorates are the most advanced terminal degrees in the field of business and management. Most individuals obtaining management doctorates take the programs to obtain the training in research methods, statistical analysis and writing academic papers that they will need to seek careers as researchers, senior consultants and/or professors in business administration or management. There are several types of management doctorates: the Doctor of Management (DM), the Doctor of Business Administration (DBA), the Doctor of Public Administration(DPA), the PhD in business administration, the PhD in management, and the PhD in political science with a concentration in public administration. In the 2010s, doctorates in business administration and management were available with many specializations.

Good practices

While management trends can change fast, the long-term trend in management has been defined by a market embracing diversity and a rising service industry. Managers are currently being trained to encourage greater equality for minorities and women in the workplace, by offering increased flexibility in working hours, better retraining, and innovative (and usually industry-specific) performance markers. Managers destined for the service sector are being trained to use unique measurement techniques, better worker support and more charismatic leadership styles.[32] Human resources finds itself increasingly working with management in a training capacity to help collect management data on the success (or failure) of management actions with employees.[33]

Good practices identified for managers include "walking the shop floor",[34] and, especially for managers who are new in post, identifying and achieving some "quick wins" which demonstrate visible success in establishing appropriate objectives. Leadership writer John Kotter uses the phrase "Short-Term Wins" to express the same idea.[35] As in all work, achieving an appropriate work-life balance for self and others is an important management practice.[36]

Evidence-based management

Main article: Evidence-based management

Evidence-based management is an emerging movement to use the current, best evidence in management and decision-making. It is part of the larger movement towards evidence-based practices. Evidence-based management entails managerial decisions and organizational practices informed by the best available evidence.[37] As with other evidence-based practice, this is based on the three principles of: published peer-reviewed (often in management or social science journals) research evidence that bears on whether and why a particular management practice works; judgement and experience from contextual management practice, to understand the organization and interpersonal dynamics in a situation and determine the risks and benefits of available actions; and the preferences and values of those affected.[38][39]

History

Some see management as a late-modern (in the sense of late modernity) conceptualization.[40] On those terms it cannot have a pre-modern history – only harbingers (such as stewards). Others, however, detect management-like thought among ancient Sumerian traders and the builders of the pyramids of ancient Egypt. Slave-owners through the centuries faced the problems of exploiting and motivating a dependent but sometimes unenthusiastic or recalcitrant workforce, but many pre-industrial enterprises, given their small scale, did not feel compelled to face the issues of management systematically. However, innovations such as the spread of Arabic numerals (5th to 15th centuries) and the codification of double-entry book-keeping (1494) provided tools for management assessment, planning and control.

  • An organisation is more stable if members have the right to express their differences and solve their conflicts within it.
  • While one person can begin an organisation, "it is lasting when it is left in the care of many and when many desire to maintain it".
  • A weak manager can follow a strong one, but not another weak one, and maintain authority.
  • A manager seeking to change an established organization "should retain at least a shadow of the ancient customs".

With the changing workplaces of industrial revolutions in the 18th and 19th centuries, military theory and practice contributed approaches to managing the newly popular factories.[41]

Given the scale of most commercial operations and the lack of mechanized record-keeping and recording before the industrial revolution, it made sense for most owners of enterprises in those times to carry out management functions by and for themselves. But with growing size and complexity of organizations, a distinction between owners (individuals, industrial dynasties or groups of shareholders) and day-to-day managers (independent specialists in planning and control) gradually became more common.

Early writing

The field of management originated in ancient China,[42] including possibly the first highly centralized bureaucratic state, and the earliest (by the second century BC) example of an administration based on merit through testing.[43] Some theorists have cited ancient military texts as providing lessons for civilian managers. For example, Chinese general Sun Tzu in his 6th-century BC work The Art of War recommends[citation needed] (when re-phrased in modern terminology) being aware of and acting on strengths and weaknesses of both a manager's organization and a foe's.[44][need quotation to verify] The writings of influential Chinese Legalist philosopher Shen Buhai may be considered[by whom?] to embody a rare premodern example of abstract theory of administration.[45][46] American philosopher Herrlee G. Creel and other scholars find the influence of Chinese administration in Europe by the 12th century.[47][48][49][50] Thomas Taylor Meadows, Britain's consul in Guangzhou, argued in his Desultory Notes on the Government and People of China (1847) that "the long duration of the Chinese empire is solely and altogether owing to the good government which consists in the advancement of men of talent and merit only," and that the British must reform their civil service by making the institution meritocratic.[51] Influenced by the ancient Chinese imperial examination, the Northcote–Trevelyan Report of 1854 recommended that recruitment should be on the basis of merit determined through competitive examination, candidates should have a solid general education to enable inter-departmental transfers, and promotion should be through achievement rather than "preferment, patronage, or purchase".[52][51] This led to implementation of Her Majesty's Civil Service as a systematic, meritocratic civil service bureaucracy.[53] Like the British, the development of French bureaucracy was influenced by the Chinese system. Voltaire claimed that the Chinese had "perfected moral science" and François Quesnay advocated an economic and political system modeled after that of the Chinese.[54] French civil service examinations adopted in the late 19th century were also heavily based on general cultural studies. These features have been likened to the earlier Chinese model.[55]

Various ancient and medieval civilizations produced "mirrors for princes" books, which aimed to advise new monarchs on how to govern. Plato described job specialization in 350 BC, and Alfarabi listed several leadership traits in AD 900.[56] Other examples include the Indian Arthashastra by Chanakya (written around 300 BC), and The Prince by Italian author Niccolò Machiavelli (c. 1515).[57]

Further information: Mirrors for princes

Written in 1776 by Adam Smith, a Scottish moral philosopher, The Wealth of Nations discussed efficient organization of work through division of labour.[57] Smith described how changes in processes could boost productivity in the manufacture of pins. While individuals could produce 200 pins per day, Smith analyzed the steps involved in manufacture and, with 10 specialists, enabled production of 48,000 pins per day.[57][need quotation to verify]

19th century

Classical economists such as Adam Smith (1723–1790) and John Stuart Mill (1806–1873) provided a theoretical background to resource allocation, production (economics), and pricing issues. About the same time, innovators like Eli Whitney (1765–1825), James Watt (1736–1819), and Matthew Boulton (1728–1809) developed elements of technical production such as standardization, quality-control procedures, cost-accounting, interchangeability of parts, and work-planning. Many of these aspects of management existed in the pre-1861 slave-based sector of the US economy. That environment saw 4 million people, as the contemporary usages had it, "managed" in profitable quasi-mass production[58] before wage slavery eclipsed chattel slavery.

Salaried managers as an identifiable group first became prominent in the late 19th century.[59] As large corporations began to overshadow small family businesses the need for personnel management positions became more necessary.[60] Businesses grew into large corporations and the need for clerks, bookkeepers, secretaries and managers expanded. The demand for trained managers led college and university administrators to consider and move forward with plans to create the first schools of business on their campuses.

20th century

At the turn of the twentieth century the need for skilled and trained managers had become increasingly apparent. The demand occurred as personnel departments began to expand rapidly. In 1915, less than one in twenty manufacturing firms had a dedicated personnel department. By 1929 that number had grown to over one-third.[61] Formal management education became standardized at colleges and universities.[62] Colleges and universities capitalized on the needs of corporations by forming business schools and corporate placement departments.[63] This shift toward formal business education marked the creation of a corporate elite in the US.

By about 1900 one finds managers trying to place their theories on what they regarded as a thoroughly scientific basis (see scientism for perceived limitations of this belief). Examples include Henry R. Towne's Science of management in the 1890s, Frederick Winslow Taylor's The Principles of Scientific Management (1911), Lillian Gilbreth's Psychology of Management (1914),[64] Frank and Lillian Gilbreth's Applied motion study (1917), and Henry L. Gantt's charts (1910s). J. Duncan wrote the first college management textbook in 1911. In 1912 Yoichi Ueno introduced Taylorism to Japan and became the first management consultant of the "Japanese management style". His son Ichiro Ueno pioneered Japanese quality assurance.

The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920.[citation needed] The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841–1925) and Alexander Church (1866–1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early 20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891–1973), Walter Scott (1869–1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880–1949), Mary Parker Follett (1868–1933), Chester Barnard (1886–1961), Max Weber (1864–1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat,[65] Rensis Likert (1903–1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociological perspective.

The 1930s and 1940s saw the development of a militarization trend in management in parts of Eurasia – both the NKVD (in the Soviet Union) and the SS (in the Greater Germanic Reich), for example, managed labor camps as industrial enterprises using slave labor supervised by uniformed cadres.[66][67] Military habits persisted in some management circles.[68]

Peter Drucker (1909–2005) wrote one of the earliest books on applied management: Concept of the Corporation (published in 1946). It resulted from Alfred Sloan (chairman of General Motors until 1956) commissioning a study of the organisation. Drucker went on to write 39 books, many in the same vein.

H. Dodge, Ronald Fisher (1890–1962), and Thornton C. Fry introduced statistical techniques into management-studies. In the 1940s, Patrick Blackett worked in the development of the applied-mathematics science of operations research, initially for military operations. Operations research, sometimes known as "management science" (but distinct from Taylor's scientific management), attempts to take a scientific approach to solving decision-problems, and can apply directly to multiple management problems, particularly in the areas of logistics and operations.

Some of the later 20th-century developments include the theory of constraints (introduced in 1984), management by objectives (systematised in 1954), re-engineering (early 1990s), Six Sigma (1986), management by walking around (1970s), the Viable system model (1972), and various information-technology-driven theories such as agile software development (so-named from 2001), as well as group-management theories such as Cog's Ladder (1972) and the notion of "thriving on chaos"[69] (1987).

As the general recognition of managers as a class solidified during the 20th century and gave perceived practitioners of the art/science of management a certain amount of prestige, so the way opened for popularised systems of management ideas to peddle their wares. In this context many management fads may have had more to do with pop psychology than with scientific theories of management.

Business management[when?] includes the following branches:[citation needed]

  1. financial management
  2. human resource management
  3. Management cybernetics
  4. information technology management (responsible for management information systems )
  5. marketing management
  6. operations management and production management
  7. strategic management

21st century

In the 21st century observers find it increasingly difficult to subdivide management into functional categories in this way. More and more processes simultaneously involve several categories. Instead, one tends to think in terms of the various processes, tasks, and objects subject to management.[citation needed]

Branches of management theory also exist relating to nonprofits and to government: such as public administration, public management, and educational management. Further, management programs related to civil-society organizations have also spawned programs in nonprofit management and social entrepreneurship.

Note that many of the assumptions made by management have come under attack from business-ethics viewpoints, critical management studies, and anti-corporate activism.

As one consequence, workplace democracy (sometimes referred to as Workers' self-management) has become both more common and more advocated, in some places distributing all management functions among workers, each of whom takes on a portion of the work. However, these models predate any current political issue, and may occur more naturally than does a command hierarchy. All management embraces to some degree a democratic principle—in that in the long term, the majority of workers must support management. Otherwise, they leave to find other work or go on strike. Despite the move toward workplace democracy, command-and-control organization structures remain commonplace as de facto organization structures. Indeed, the entrenched nature of command-and-control is evident in the way that recent[when?] layoffs have been conducted with management ranks affected far less than employees at the lower levels.[citation needed] In some cases, management has even rewarded itself with bonuses after laying off lower-level workers.[70]

According to leadership-academic Manfred F.R. Kets de Vries, a contemporary senior-management team will almost inevitably have some personality disorders.[71]

Nature of work

In profitable organizations, management's primary function is the satisfaction of a range of stakeholders. This typically involves making a profit (for the shareholders), creating valued products at a reasonable cost (for customers), and providing great employment opportunities for employees. In case of nonprofit management, one of the main functions is, keeping the faith of donors. In most models of management and governance, shareholders vote for the board of directors, and the board then hires senior management. Some organizations have experimented with other methods (such as employee-voting models) of selecting or reviewing managers, but this is rare.

Topics

Basics

According to Fayol, management operates through five basic functions: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling.

  • Planning: Deciding what needs to happen in the future and generating plans for action (deciding in advance).
  • Organizing (or staffing): Making sure the human and nonhuman resources are put into place.[72]
  • Commanding (or leading): Determining what must be done in a situation and getting people to do it.
  • Coordinating: Creating a structure through which an organization's goals can be accomplished.
  • Controlling: Checking progress against plans.

Basic roles

  • Interpersonal: roles that involve coordination and interaction with employees.

Figurehead, leader, liaison

  • Informational: roles that involve handling, sharing, and analyzing information.

Nerve centre, disseminator, spokesperson

  • Decision: roles that require decision-making.

Entrepreneur, negotiator, allocator, disturbance handler

Skills

Management skills include:

  • Political: used to build a power base and to establish connections.
  • Interpersonal: used to communicate, motivate, mentor and delegate.
  • Diagnostic: ability to visualize appropriate responses to a situation.
  • Leadership: ability to communicate a vision and inspire people to embrace that vision.[73]
  • Behavioral: perception towards others, conflict resolution, time-management, self-improvement, stress management and resilience, patience, clear communication.[74]

Implementation of policies and strategies

  • All policies and strategies must be discussed with all managerial personnel and staff.
  • Managers must understand where and how they can implement their policies and strategies.
  • An action plan must be devised for each department.
  • Policies and strategies must be reviewed regularly.
  • Contingency plans must be devised in case the environment changes.
  • Top-level managers should carry out regular progress assessments.
  • The business requires team spirit and a good environment.
  • The missions, objectives, strengths and weaknesses of each department must be analyzed to determine their roles in achieving the business's mission.
  • The forecasting method develops a reliable picture of the business's future environment.
  • A planning unit must be created to ensure that all plans are consistent and that policies and strategies are aimed at achieving the same mission and objectives.

Policies and strategies in the planning process

  • They give mid and lower-level managers a good idea of the future plans for each department in an organization.
  • A framework is created whereby plans and decisions are made.
  • Mid and lower-level management may add their own plans to the business's strategies.

See also

References

  1. "Top 7 Behavioral Skills to Develop Within your Employees". ProSky - Learn Skills, Do Projects, Get Hired by Amazing Companies. Retrieved 2021-04-22.

External links

Management

Social sciences

Authority control databases Edit this at Wikidata


Links  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Management

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Management_by_type

http://www.dmoz.org/Business/Management/

Subcategories``ёёё]]]

`0-9

`A

Associations

► Management accounting (1 C, 94 P)

Business Process Analysis

`B

Benchmarking and Best Practices

► Brand management (15 C, 124 P)

`C

Organizational Change

Communication Skills

Theory of Constraints

`D

Organizational Development

`E

► Management education (2 C, 74 P)

Education and Training

Employment

► Emergency management (14 C, 121 P)

► Environmental management (7 C, 18 P)

Ethics

`F

► Fleet Management (3 P)

Financial

`G

`H

► Hospitality management (1 C, 27 P)

Human Resources

`I

► Information management (1 C, 17 P)

Management Information Systems

Information Technology Management

`J

`K

► Knowledge management (2 C, 64 P)

`L

► Land management (17 C, 93 P)

Leadership

`M

`N

News and Media

`O

► Operations research (17 C, 184 P)

► Management organizations (1 C, 16 P)

``P

► Problem structuring methods (11 P)

Public Sector

Project and Program Management

► Management publications (3 C, 3 P)

► Product lifecycle management (2 C, 71 P)

► Project management (8 C, 299 P)

► Property management (1 C, 39 P)

`Q

Quality Management

`R

► Research management (1 C, 15 P)

Recruiting and Search

`S

  • ► Shipping management (9 C, 33 P)

Software

Security Investigation

Strategic Management

Strategy and Forecasting

Supply Chain

Management Science

`T

► Theatrical management (3 C, 17 P)

► Traffic management (8 C, 7 P)

► Management terminology (8 P)

► Management theory (2 C, 2 P)

`U`V

Value Based Management

Virtual Corporations

`W`X`Y`Z

► Wikipedia books on management (1 P)

► Management stubs (107 P)

Index

```[[[ёёё

Index of management articles

Management

Outline of business management

`A

` A3 problem solving

Abusive supervision

Action item

Adhocracy

Advisory board

Agile contracts

Airport and airline management

Allegiance (company)

Annex SL

Association management

Association management company

Authoritarian leadership style

Automated decision support

`B

` Backsourcing

Balanced scorecard

Base Stock Model

Bed management

Behavioral risk management

Best current practice

Best practice

Board of directors

Board of governors

Bottleneck (production)

Build to order

Build to stock

Business agility

Business builder

Business economics

Business Evaluation and Management

Business guru

Business model

Business plan

Business process interoperability

Business process mapping

Business relationship management

Business rule

Business rule mining

Business value

Business workflow analysis

Business-oriented architecture

`C

` Capability management

Capability management in business

Category management (purchasing)

Central administration

Certified in Production and Inventory Management

Certified management consultant

Certified Project Management Professional

Change advisory board

Chaordic organization

CIFMS

City management

Cog's ladder

Cognitive inertia

Commercial management

Communications management

Communities of innovation

Community management

Community of practice

Community-based management

Competence-based management

Competitive advantage

Competitive heterogeneity

Complementary assets

Completed staff work

Concept of operations

Concept of the Corporation

Friedrich Glasl's Model of Conflict Escalation

Consensus decision-making

Context analysis

Continuous monitoring

Continuous-flow manufacturing

Contractor management

Control (management)

Corporate and Project Management Research Institute

Corporate Governance

Draft:Service governance

Corporate recovery

Corporate transparency

Corrective and preventive action

Corticon

Court of assistants

Coworking

CPS model

Crisis management

Crisis plan

Critical chain project management

Critical management studies

Critical path method

Cross ownership

Customer benefit package

Cynefin Framework

`D

` Data item descriptions

Decentralized decision-making

Decision management

Defensive expenditures

Delegation

Demand chain management

Design leadership

Design management

Devaux’s Index of Project Performance (the DIPP)

Diffusion (business)

Digital strategy

Discovery-driven planning

Disintermediation

Distributed management

DMSMS

Document automation

Double linking

Downstream (manufacturing)

Duality (CoPs)

Dynamic enterprise modeling

Dynamic lot-size model

`E

` Earned schedule

Earned value management

Economic lot scheduling problem

Economic order quantity

Economic production quantity

Empowerment

Energy management software

Energy monitoring and targeting

Engineer to order

Engineering management

Enterprise optimization

Enterprise planning system

Enterprise resource planning

Entertainment management

Entrepreneurial orientation

Environmental stewardship

Error Management (EM)

Event chain methodology

Evidence-based management

Executive compensation

Executive development

Experience curve effects

Extended enterprise

`F

` Facilitation

Facilitator

Failure demand

Fall guy

Feedforward (management)

Field force automation

Field service management

Final assembly schedule

Financial planning (business)

Flat organization

Fleet management

Focused improvement

Force-field analysis

Formula for change

Four phase model

Fraud deterrence

Functional management

`G

G

` Global R&D management

Gemba

Goal

Goals breakdown structure

Management vs Governance

Gradients of agreement scale

`H

` Heijunka box

Hierarchical organization

`I

` I-VMS

Identity formation

In-depth-systemics

Industrial democracy

Industrial forensics

Industrial market segmentation

Industry or market research

Information excellence

Information technology security audit

Infrastructure asset management

Innovation leadership

Innovation management

Inside job

Instruction creep

Integrated management

Integrated master plan

Integrative thinking

Intellectual capital management

Intelligent customer

Interim management

Internal customer

Intopia

Investment control

IT performance management

Iterative and incremental development

`J

` Japanese management culture

Jarratt report

Job rotation

Joy's law (management)

Just in case J

` Just-in-time manufacturing

`K

` Kata

Kick the cat

Kick the dog

Kiss up kick down

Knowledge-based decision making

Knowledge ecosystem

Knowledge inertia

`L

` Law practice management

Lead scoring

Leader–member exchange theory

Leadership Series

Lean thinking

Lean manufacturing

Production leveling

Lessons learned

Libertarian management

Line management

Line of business

Linear scheduling method

List of business theorists

List of financial institutions that invest in infrastructure

Local management board

Logistics engineering

Logistics support analysis

`M

` Machiavellianism in the workplace

Main street manager

Fredmund Malik

Managed services

Management buy-in

Management buyout

Management by exception

Management by Objectives

Draft:Management cockpit

Management due diligence

Management entrenchment

Management fad

Management science

Management styles

Management Week

Manager Tools Podcast

Managerial economics

Managerial hubris

Managerial prerogative

Managerial psychology

Managerialism

Managing stage boundaries

Managing up and managing down

Manufacturing resource planning

Marketing management

Marketing plan

Marketing science

Maryland StateStat

Master production schedule

Material requirements planning

Matrix management

Meeting

Meeting system

Middle management

Millennium software

Mission critical

Mobile sales enablement

Modes of leadership

Moral Mazes

Multidimensional organization

Mushroom management

`N

` Narcissism in the workplace

Narcissistic leadership

Newsvendor model

Nonconformity (quality)

`O

` Office management

One in, one out policy

Opera management

Operations management

Operations research

Organizational conflict

Organizational diagnostics

Organizational hologram

Organizational space

Oriental management

Outrage constraint

Outsourcing

Overtime rate

`P

P

` Performance Based Contracting

Parallel running

Pareto analysis

Participative decision-making

PDCA

PDX (IPC-257X)

Peer pressure

Performance indicator

Performance management

Performance measurement

Personal offshoring

Perth leadership outcome model

PhD in management

Place management

Plan

Planning fallacy

Policy capturing

Pomodoro Technique

Porter's five forces analysis

Porter's four corners model

Post-graduate diploma in management studies (UK)

Power structure

Power to the edge (management technique)

Preparation (principle)

Preventive action

Private defense agency

Process capability

Process-based management

Product breakdown structure

Product Development and Systems Engineering Consortium

Product differentiation

Product life-cycle management (marketing)

Production flow analysis

Productive efficiency

Professional

List of professional institutions in management

Professional performances

ProFIT-MAP methodology

Profitable growth

Progress, plans, problems

Project management

Project management information system

Project management simulation

Project stakeholder

Project team builder

Psychopathy in the workplace

Public sector consulting

Purchasing management

`Q

` Quality (business)

Quality control

Quality, cost, delivery

Quick response manufacturing

`~R

` Radical transparency

R&D management

Real property administrator

Records manager

Relational view

Remedial action

Resource breakdown structure

Resource Management

Resource slack

Resource-based view

Responsible autonomy

Restructuring

Reverse hierarchy

Reverse innovation

Risk appetite

Risk intelligence

Risk management

Risk-based inspection

``S

` Sales outsourcing

Scenario planning

Scheduling (production processes)

Scrum (software development)

Scrumban

Security management

Semiconductor consolidation

Senior management

Sensemaking

Service economy

Service recovery

Service recovery paradox

Shamrock organization

Shrinkage (accounting)

SimulTrain

Situational crisis communication theory

Six phases of a big project

Smiling curve

Social business model

Social risk management

Social work

Soviet (council)

Stakeholder (law)

Stewardship

Stewardship theory

Stovepipe (organisation)

Strategic group

Strategic lenses

Strategic management

Template:Strategy

Strategy dynamics

Stress management

Submission management

Success trap

Success-oriented management

Supervisory board

Supplier performance management

Supplier relationship management

Supply chain

Supply chain network

Supply chain optimization

Supply chain sustainability

Supply management (procurement)

Supply network

Swarm Development Group

Systems analysis

Systems thinkingT

` Tacit knowledge

Target culture

Target operating model

Task-oriented and relationship-oriented leadership

Tata Management Training Centre

Taylor Society

Team Management

Technology scouting

Technostructure

Telescopic observations strategic framework

Third-generation balanced scorecard

Third Party Management

Throughput (business)

Time–distance diagram

Topple rate

Total security management

Total Worker Health

Toxic leader

The Toyota Way

Trustee

Twelve leverage points

`U

` U-procedure and theory U

Unified interoperability

`V

` Value proposition

Vasa syndrome

Vendor relationship management

Virtual customer environment

Virtuous circle and vicious circle

Visual learning

Voice of the customer

Voluntary redundancy

Vorstand

`W

` Steve Wilke

Williamson's model of managerial discretion

Wireless informatics

Work breakdown structure

Workers' control

Workers' self-management

Workflow

Workflow APIs and interchange formats

Workplace spirituality

Pages in Other Languages

Categories:

Organizational theory

Economics

Categories by type

Accountability

Professional studies

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.